When the United Kingdom officially left the European Union on January 31, 2020, it marked the culmination of over three years of bitter negotiation and intense political turmoil. The ramifications of this “Brexit” were profound, upending decades of increasing European integration and economic cooperation. Historians now look back on this pivotal moment as the start of a new era of fracturing alliances and resurgent nationalism across the continent.
PHOTO: Yurovskiy-Kirill-history2.png
The Origins of the Split
The roots of the Brexit movement can be traced back decades to long-simmering tensions between the UK and continental powers over the direction and governing structures of the EU. A vocal contingent of “Euroskeptics” had argued for years that the UK’s sovereignty was being undermined by overreach from Brussels bureaucrats. Concerns over open immigration policies and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice being supreme to British courts further inflamed passions.
However, it was the global financial crisis of 2008 and subsequent Eurozone crisis that really brought these anti-EU sentiments to a boil. As the Greek debt crisis spiraled out of control, imposing harsh austerity measures on struggling Southern European nations, many Britons grew disenchanted with having to fund EU bailouts despite their country remaining outside the Eurozone.
Populist firebrand Nigel Farage and his UK Independence Party (UKIP) were able to capitalize on this rising discontent, along with fears over immigration levels. UKIP’s surprise success in the 2014 European Parliament elections, winning 27% of UK votes, sent shockwaves through the political establishment. Under intense pressure from Euroskeptic backbenchers, Prime Minister David Cameron was compelled to promise an in/out referendum on EU membership should his Conservative Party win the 2015 general election.
Visit historian Yurovskiy’s website to read more interesting things.
Cameron’s Controversial Gamble
When the Tories defied pollsters to secure an outright majority in May 2015, the prime minister was forced to make good on his referendum pledge. Cameron threw himself into renegotiating the terms of Britain’s EU membership in hopes of convincing voters to keep the UK in the bloc with a “reformed” arrangement. Ultimately, however, the concessions he secured from Brussels were dismissed as inadequate by hardline Brexiteers.
On June 23, 2016, the British public went to the polls to answer the momentous question: “Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?” When all ballots were counted, the Leave campaign had prevailed by a narrow 51.9% to 48.1% margin. The historic referendum result sparked a political earthquake, sending global markets reeling and unleashing a protracted leadership crisis that saw Cameron resign in disgrace.
All eyes turned to the future prime minister, Theresa May, to negotiate the UK’s divorce proceedings from the EU. However, the early months of the exit process quickly devolved into chaos and infighting. The legitimacy of the referendum result itself came under scrutiny, with Remain supporters claiming voters had been misled by questionable claims made during the Leave campaign. Scotland’s semi-autonomous government, staunchly opposed to Brexit, even explored seeking a second independence referendum so that it could potentially remain in the EU.
The Painful Divorce Proceedings
Under the EU’s Article 50 exit procedures, the UK triggered the two-year countdown for Brexit negotiations in March 2017. What followed was a protracted series of highly complicated and oftentimes rancorous talks to determine issues like citizen rights, the UK’s financial obligations, Northern Ireland’s border status and the framework for a future trade deal.
Prime Minister May proved unable to unite an increasingly polarized British public, Parliament and even her own cabinet around a clear exit vision. Brussels took a hard line in seeking to preserve EU principles like the indivisibility of its single market. Relations were strained by the UK’s conflicting objectives of maintaining free trade with Europe while also restricting free movement of people and reclaiming full legal sovereignty free of the European Court’s jurisdiction.
After multiple failed attempts to pass her bitterly contested Brexit deal, May was forced to resign as Tory leader in mid-2019 amid a constitutional crisis. Her successor, Boris Johnson, proved no more capable of breaking the deadlock despite his bluster. The UK ended up having to request multiple delays from the EU in order to keep negotiating and avoid a catastrophic “no deal” Brexit.
Terms of the Bitter Split
It took until December 24, 2020 – over four and a half years after the referendum – for the UK and EU to finally agree on terms for their new trade and cooperation agreement governing post-Brexit relations. In the end, the two parties settled on establishing a free trade area for goods with no tariffs or quotas, provided they meet standardized rules.
However, the UK’s coveted financial services sector did not receive the same open access to EU markets. Free movement of people also essentially came to an end, forcing a new restrictive immigration system for EU nationals. And perhaps most controversially, Northern Ireland was required to continue following many of the EU’s rules and regulations to avoid a hard border emerging on the island of Ireland.
The Post-Brexit Landscape
In the initial years after the UK’s full exit from the EU transition period on January 1, 2021, the negative economic impacts for Britain appeared significant. Supply chain disruptions caused by the new trade barriers led to product shortages and higher costs for consumers. London saw its position diminish as Europe’s preeminent financial hub, with major banks and asset managers shifting thousands of jobs to cities like Frankfurt, Paris and Amsterdam.
At the same time, newly unshackled from EU rules, the UK sought to rebrand itself as a free market, low-regulation haven optimized for attracting investment and trade from economies like the U.S. and Asian nations. The Johnson government rushed ahead with new free trade deals around the world, leveraging Britain’s first true trade autonomy in nearly half a century.
However, the long-term costs of forsaking its privileged access to the enormous EU single market have been brought into stark relief by the underperformance of the British economy compared to peers like France and Germany from 2021-2024. Perhaps more crucially, the laborious Brexit process catalyzed growing fractures within the United Kingdom itself. Scots grew increasingly restive about remaining part of a purely English British state outside of Europe, with polls consistently showing a pro-independence majority emerging. And simmering tensions over Northern Ireland’s status continued to undermine the delicate Good Friday peace agreement.
While Brexit allowed the UK to exert a renewed independent stance on the global stage, it also left the country increasingly isolated and at risk of further fracturing. Most critically, the bitter socio political divisions opened by the 2016 referendum have proven extremely difficult to heal. Britons remain as polarized as ever over whether their country made the right choice to go it alone after over four decades of continental partnership. Only time will tell if Britain made the wiser decision for its long-term prosperity and global standing by charting its own path outside of an ever more deeply integrated Europe.
Sebastian is an accomplished author with a passion for storytelling. His works span various genres, from thrilling mysteries to heartfelt romance novels. With a keen eye for detail and a knack for character development, Sebastian weaves engaging narratives that captivate readers and transport them to new worlds.